What Was Tested on the February 2025 California Bar Exam Retest
Mission Reminder:
At Brieflex.ai, we train law students and bar takers like athletes—through discipline, repetition, and analytics that turn study into performance.
🧭 Overview
The February 2025 California Bar Exam Retest presented a focused and balanced mix of core subjects.
Following the unusual double administration of the February exam, the Retest shifted away from Property and Wills toward Constitutional Law, Community Property, Contracts and Remedies, Criminal Procedure, and Professional Responsibility — capped by a Performance Test in the form of an Objective Memorandum.
Each essay favored precise issue spotting and disciplined structure over volume — consistent with the Bar’s continued emphasis on analytical clarity.
🧩 Essay Breakdown
Essay 1 – Constitutional Law
This essay tested individual rights under the Fourteenth Amendment, with a focus on Equal Protection and the First Amendment.
The fact pattern raised questions about governmental classification, free speech restrictions, and potential overbreadth.
Core Issues Tested:
- Equal Protection (levels of scrutiny)
- Free Speech (content-based vs. content-neutral regulation)
- State Action and Standing
- Due Process procedural analysis
Professor’s Note: The prompt rewarded examinees who could quickly classify the government regulation and apply the correct level of scrutiny without drifting into policy argument.
Essay 2 – Community Property
The second essay brought back California-specific doctrine in a traditional format.
It involved a married couple with assets acquired before and during marriage, transmutations by agreement, and questions of management and control.
Core Issues Tested:
- Characterization: Separate vs. Community Property
- Commingling and Tracing
- Transmutation (writing and intent)
- Division on Dissolution
Observation: Organization was key. Essays that handled each asset sequentially — classify, apply rule, conclude — would align best with the grading rubric.
Essay 3 – Contracts and Remedies
This problem combined contract formation and breach with a subsequent remedies discussion, testing both common law and UCC principles.
Core Issues Tested:
- Offer, Acceptance, Consideration
- Material Breach and Anticipatory Repudiation
- Expectation and Reliance Damages
- Restitution and Mitigation
Observation: The essay rewarded linear IRAC structure — formation → performance → breach → remedy. Rule recall and logical sequencing outweighed broad or policy-based discussion.
Essay 4 – Criminal Procedure
A classic procedural essay. The fact pattern included a vehicle stop, search, confession, and the introduction of evidence at trial.
Core Issues Tested:
- Fourth Amendment: Warrant Requirement and Exceptions (Consent, Plain View, Automobile)
- Fifth Amendment: Miranda and Voluntariness
- Exclusionary Rule and Fruit of the Poisonous Tree
- Standing to Challenge Searches
Observation: Success required chronological reasoning — mapping each constitutional question to the procedural stage where the violation allegedly occurred.
Essay 5 – Professional Responsibility
Professional Responsibility appeared in a litigation context, raising conflicts of interest and duties of candor and communication.
Core Issues Tested:
- Duty of Loyalty and Conflict Identification
- Duty of Confidentiality
- Duty of Candor to the Tribunal
- Duty of Communication with Clients
Observation: The question continued the California Bar’s consistent pattern: PR is tested every exam, often linked to another fact pattern involving litigation or business representation.
⚖️ Performance Test – Objective Memorandum
The Performance Test required examinees to draft an Objective Memorandum analyzing potential constitutional and procedural claims.
The file and library materials guided examinees to evaluate both factual sufficiency and controlling precedent under time pressure.
Skills Tested:
- Reading comprehension and organization
- Rule synthesis across multiple cases
- Objective tone and professional memo structure
- Time management under 90-minute conditions
Brieflex Analysis: The PT favored methodical organization and concise application. Overwriting was less valuable than clarity of reasoning.
🧠 Training Observations
The February 2025 Retest reinforced enduring bar principles:
- Precision over length: Clear rule statements and concise analysis remain decisive.
- Balanced coverage: The retest avoided niche crossover issues, favoring foundational subjects.
- Rule retention: Examiners continue to test straightforward applications of major doctrines under high time pressure.
- PT trend: The Objective Memo continues its steady rotation, consistent with prior February exams.
💡 Brieflex Training Note
A Brieflex user approaches this exam with a system, not guesswork:
- Drill rule recall until response time is reflexive.
- Write short IRAC bursts, not long summaries.
- Evaluate each PT for structure before substance — format discipline is half the score.
Brieflex Pro Tip: When five essays cover distinct core subjects, the key advantage is transition control — shifting instantly from one area of law to another without cognitive reset.
⚡ Call to Action
Train with Brieflex.ai — the bar-prep platform built for discipline, speed, and retention.
Start your 10-Minute Brieflex Drill today.
